Other tribes were also removed to the Native American territory. Miller: T he Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a dark stain on American history. Q: Explain the Trail of Tears and other atrocities Native Americans endured because of the defiance of the original Supreme Court decision. Miller: The land and all of its assets - oil, timber, minerals. So why were federal and state governments interfering and trying to usurp the promise? It's fairly simple - they wanted the land. The federal government, for decades, turned a blind eye to Oklahoma and other state encroachments. Treaty with the Creek Nation - the treaty forged after the Civil War.Įthridge:Before the ink even dried on these treaties, the federal government began interfering with Native Americans’ sovereignty and jurisdictions.Īnd once Oklahoma gained statehood, it began to encroach on Native American rights. Miller: This promise to the Creeks and other removed groups was made in the 1830 Indian Removal Act, reiterated in the 1832 Treaty with the Creeks - which was the treaty for Creek removal and in the 1866 U.S. Once on those new lands, the Creeks would govern themselves and have jurisdiction over their territories in perpetuity. would guarantee lands for the Creeks in present-day Oklahoma. Question: Your book is titled “A Promise Kept” - what was the original promise made to the Creeks by the Supreme Court?Įthridge: The promise was that in exchange for Muscogee (Creek) Nation homelands in present-day Georgia and Alabama, the U.S. Here, the authors discuss the new book and the history behind and impact of the Supreme Court rulingĮditor's note: Answers have been edited for length and clarity. Supreme Court decision and violently confiscated land from the Muscogee (Creek) Nation. She provides the historic context of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation, including the dark period when President Andrew Jackson defied the U.S. In the book, he offers a legal analysis of how the case unfolded and what contributed to the final decision.Įthridge specializes in historical anthropology as it relates to Native Americans of the American South. He also happens to be member of the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma. He is a legal scholar and expert in federal Native American law. Miller teaches at the ASU Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law and has followed the case since 2020. RELATED: Labriola Center book talk with Robert Miller on Feb. 26, was co-authored by Arizona State University Professor Robert Miller and University of Mississippi Professor Emeritus Robbie Ethridge. The book, which will be availablie on Jan. Oklahoma,” explains the legal and historical implications of the ruling, both for the Muscogee (Creek) Nation people and other Native American nations throughout the country. A new book, titled “ A Promise Kept: The Muscogee (Creek) Nation and McGirt v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |